WebThe Federal Trade Commission (FTC) entered a cease-and-desist order against Sperry & Hutchinson Co. (S&H), the largest and oldest trading stamp company, on the ground that it unfairly attempted to suppress the operation of trading stamp exchanges and other 'free and open' redemption of stamps.
Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.
Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Trading Stamp Co., 405 U.S. 233 (1972), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) may act against a company's “unfair” business practices even though the practice is none of the following: an antitrust violation, an incipient antitrust violation, a violation of the “spirit” of the antitrust laws, or a deceptive practice. This legal theory is termed the "unfairness doctrine." WebThe Federal Trade Commission and the Sherman Act Herbert J. Hovenkamp ... Mosler Safe Co. v. Ely-Norris Safe Co., 273 U.S. 132 (1927) (reversing a lower court ... 15. See the detailed account of the legislative history in FTC v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co., 405 U.S. 233, 239-41(1972). See also. FTC v. Cement Inst., 333 U.S. 683, 693 (1948); FTC v ... cedric porcher
Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Company
WebSperry & Hutchinson Co., 432 F.2d 146 (5th Cir. 1970), modified and remanded, 405 U.S. 233, 92 S. Ct. 898, 31 L. Ed. 2d 170 (1972). In that case, the Federal Trade Commission found that S&H had engaged in the practice of attempting, through litigation and threat of litigation, to prevent the operation of so-called "trading stamp exchanges" and ... WebThe Federal Trade Commission (FTC) entered a cease and desist order against Sperry & Hutchinson Co. (S&H), the largest and oldest trading stamp company, on the ground … See Taddy & Co. v. Sterious & Co. (1904), 1 Ch. 354; McGruther v. Pitcher (1904), … WebNov 21, 2024 · In a 1972 case, FTC v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co ., the Supreme Court wrote that Section 5 “empower [s] the Commission to define and proscribe an unfair competitive practice, even though the practice does not infringe either the letter or the spirit of the antitrust laws.” The 1980s saw three separate U.S. Circuit Courts in Official Airline … cedric polian facebook